llcttt1994@yahoo.com.vn 
02438348033 Realizing social equality in Ho Chi Minh’s thought for the objective of sustainable human development
Abstract: The theory about sustainable human development was deeply discussed by Ho Chi Minh. His ideas showed the dialectical relationship between the realization of social equality and sustainable human development. Ho Chi Minh pointed out that the most important foundation for sustainable human development is the development of human potential, creating equal chances in accessing resources delivered by economic growth. In addition, it is important to make sure that the development of current human beings does not harm the human beings in the future and the participation of people in society should be encouraged.
Source: Journal of Political Theory and Communication, No 2-2021
Identifying and criticizing claims denying and distorting Ho Chi Minh Thought
Identifying and criticizing claims denying and distorting Ho Chi Minh Thought
Abstract: Along with the study, application, and development of Marxist - Leninist ideology and Ho Chi Minh Thought, current practice requires strengthening the protection of the Party's ideological foundation, combating, and refuting erroneous and hostile views. Among these erroneous views is the discourse that denies and distorts “Ho Chi Minh is not a thinker, there is no Ho Chi Minh Thought”. This article contributes to the identification and criticism of the discourse that denies and distorts Ho Chi Minh Thought.
HO CHI MINH’S THOUGHT ON THE METHODS OF LEADERSHIP AND RULING OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF VIETNAM
HO CHI MINH’S THOUGHT ON THE METHODS OF LEADERSHIP AND RULING OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF VIETNAM
The Communist Party of Vietnam, since its birth (in 1930), has played a leading role in the national liberation movement in Vietnam and after the success of the August Revolution, became the ruling Party. President Ho Chi Minh is both the founder and the person who guides and trains the Party. Therefore, he paid due attention to the Party's leading and ruling methods so that the Party can fulfill its mission as the vanguard of the working class and the nation. In this article, the author hopes to clarify Ho Chi Minh’s Thought on the Party's leading and ruling methods to serve the goal of improving the leadership and ruling capacity of the Communist Party of Vietnam, as set out by the 13th Party Congress.
Ho Chi Minh's wisdom on culture
Ho Chi Minh's wisdom on culture
Abstract: Ho Chi Minh's cultural philosophy is a system of scientific, revolutionary and theoretical viewpoints on culture and the construction of Vietnamese culture. It resulted from creative application and development of Marxism-Leninism into the specific conditions of Vietnam. It inherited and developed the nation's traditional values while acquiring humanity's cultural essence. This is a heritage of tremendous value both theoretically and practically for Vietnam's revolution. In this article, the author analyzes the essence of Ho Chi Minh's cultural philosophy and clarifies certain fundamental orientations of Vietnamese Communist Party on building an advanced culture imbued with the cultural identity in current conditions.
Application of Ho Chi Minh’s thought on “taking the people as the root” in building the “people’s hearts and minds posture”, consolidating national defense, and firmly protecting socialist Vietnam in new period
Application of Ho Chi Minh’s thought on “taking the people as the root” in building the “people’s hearts and minds posture”, consolidating national defense, and firmly protecting socialist Vietnam in new period
Communist Review - President Ho Chi Minh’s thought on "taking the people as the root” had paramount significance, serving as the guiding star for the Communist Party of Vietnam to lead the revolution. This mindset inherited and promoted Vietnam’s thousand-year-old history of national construction and defense and the Marxist-Leninist perspective on the role of the people in history. It should continue to be creatively applied to the cause of national construction and defense in the new period.
Comment