llcttt1994dientu@gmail.com 
02438348033 Solutions to improve the effectiveness of admission communication at the Academy of Journalism and Communication
Admission communication is especially important to higher education institutions, having direct influence on the existence and development of each institution. In the world, there is admission communication department in big names such as Harvard, Oxford and Cambridge University and even in small universities. In the context when higher education institutions are on the road for autonomy in admission and finance, it is extremely important for higher education institutions in Vietnam to build their brand.
Source: Journal of Political Theory and Communications, no 11 (2020).
Related Posts
- The Meaning of the Manuscript “Correcting the Working Habits” to the Enhancement of Ethical Quality of the Party Members and Cadres
- Reality of Accessing 10 Rules of Moral Conduct among Media Students and Recommendations
- A Discussion on the Experiences of Teaching Vietnamese Language to Foreign Students at the Academy of Journalism and Communication
A theoretical framework to Vietnam's paradiplomacy making and implementation
Abstract: Paradiplomacy, or subnational diplomacy, has become an increasingly significant dimension of international relations in the context of globalization and decentralization. In Vietnam, local diplomacy plays a vital role in the realization of the country’s foreign policy objectives, particularly in linking security, development, and international position. This article develops a theoretical framework for understanding how Vietnam formulates and implements paradiplomatic policies. It adopts a policy analysis approach based on the “ends–means–ways” and linear model, adapted to the Vietnamese political-administrative context. The framework emphasizes both vertical coordination (top-down guidance from the central level) and horizontal interaction (bottom-up initiatives from provinces and cities), reflecting the hybrid nature of Vietnam’s paradiplomacy as both a delegated and an autonomous practice within the unified foreign policy system.
Comment